Bei Speculative Evolution haben wir ausgehend von wissenschaftlichen Publikationen über synthetische Biologie, Gentechnik und Robotik überlegt, wie Arten weiterentwickelt werden könnten, um ihre Widerstandsfähigkeit zu erhöhen. Daraufhin haben wir Textanweisungen formuliert, um mit DALL-E KI-generierte Bilder zu erstellen. Jede spekulative Art in der Simulation hat so eine Hintergrundgeschichte, die in realen Szenarien verwurzelt ist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31b6f/31b6f55bc5a87faef051f23287aac92ca5c260f1" alt="Micro Robot"
Micro Robot | |
2019 | powered by soft artificial muscles Laboratory research by Chen et al., 2019 |
2054 |
Stammbaum der 41 Arten von insgesamt 57
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Zurich, Switzerland (64-1)
Samsung G986U1, Android 13, Monterrey, Mexico (64-1-1)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Zurich, Switzerland (64-2)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Pfaeffikon, Switzerland (64-2-1)
Samsung T720, Android 11, Saltburn-by-the-Sea, United Kingdom (64-2-1-1)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Pfaeffikon, Switzerland (64-4)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-2)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-2-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-2-1-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-2-1-2)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-2-1-3)
, Android 12, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-1-2-1-4)
Samsung T500, Android 12, Moers, Germany (64-4-1-2-1-4-1)
, Android 14, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-2)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-3)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-4-3-1)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Limassol, Cyprus (64-4-3-1-1)
Samsung G975F, Android 12, Leipzig, Germany (64-4-3-1-1-1)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Pfaeffikon, Switzerland (64-5)
Huawei ASK-AL00, Android 10, , China (64-5-1)
Samsung G955U, Android 9, Xi'an, China (64-5-1-1)
Samsung G955U, Android 9, Xi'an, China (64-5-1-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-6-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-6-2)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-6-2-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-6-2-1-1)
Samsung G955U, Android 9, , China (64-6-2-1-2)
Samsung G955U, Android 9, , China (64-6-2-1-3)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Lucerne, Switzerland (64-6-2-1-3-1)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Lucerne, Switzerland (64-6-2-1-4)
Samsung G955U, Android 9, Xi'an, China (64-6-2-1-5)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Lucerne, Switzerland (64-6-2-1-6)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-8)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Lucerne, Switzerland (64-8-1)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-9)
Samsung G950F, Android 9, São Paulo, Brazil (64-9-1)
Samsung S9160, Android 14, London, United Kingdom (64-9-1-1)
Samsung G955U, Android 9, Xi'an, China (64-9-1-1-1)
Samsung G955F, Android 9, Lucerne, Switzerland (64-9-1-1-1-1)
Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles
Chen, Y., Zhao, H., Mao, J. et al. Nature 575, 324–329 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1737-7
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1737-7
Abstract
Flying insects capable of navigating in highly cluttered natural environments can withstand in-flight collisions because of the combination of their low inertia1 and the resilience of their wings2, exoskeletons1 and muscles. Current insect-scale (less than ten centimetres long and weighing less than five grams) aerial robots3,4,5,6 use rigid microscale actuators, which are typically fragile under external impact. Biomimetic artificial muscles7,8,9,10 that are capable of large deformation offer a promising alternative for actuation because they can endure the stresses caused by such impacts. However, existing soft actuators11,12,13 have not yet demonstrated sufficient power density to achieve lift-off, and their actuation nonlinearity and limited bandwidth create further challenges for achieving closed-loop (driven by an input control signal that is adjusted based on sensory feedback) flight control. Here we develop heavier-than-air aerial robots powered by soft artificial muscles that demonstrate open-loop (driven by a predetermined signal without feedback), passively stable (upright during flight) ascending flight as well as closed-loop, hovering flight. The robots are driven by multi-layered dielectric elastomer actuators that weigh 100 milligrams each and have a resonance frequency of 500 hertz and power density of 600 watts per kilogram. To increase the mechanical power output of the actuator and to demonstrate flight control, we present ways to overcome challenges unique to soft actuators, such as nonlinear transduction and dynamic buckling. These robots can sense and withstand collisions with surrounding obstacles and can recover from in-flight collisions by exploiting material robustness and vehicle passive stability. We also fly two micro-aerial vehicles simultaneously in a cluttered environment. They collide with the wall and each other without suffering damage. These robots rely on offboard amplifiers and an external motion-capture system to provide power to the dielectric elastomer actuators and to control their flight. Our work demonstrates how soft actuators can achieve sufficient power density and bandwidth to enable controlled flight, illustrating the potential of developing next-generation agile soft robots.
Robot design and flapping wing kinematics.
- a, A CAD model of a 155 mg flapping wing robot driven by a dielectric elastomer actuator (DEA). The exploded view of the robot's right half shows the actuator, connector, four-bar transmission, wing, and wing hinge. The circled region of the robot's left transmission is magnified in b.
- Enlarged top view of the robot's actuator-transmission-wing assembly. The DEA is pre-strained by 2% when it is attached to the robot's transmissions, which induces a static stroke angle bias of approximately 15°. The linear DEA actuation is translated into the rotational wing stroke motion.
- Illustrations of the actively controlled wing stroke (a) motion and the passive wing pitch (B) motion.
- An image sequence of the flapping wing motion operated at 280 Hz. The time is normalized to a flapping period. The wing stroke rotation (a) induces passive wing pitch rotation (B1).
- Tracked flapping wing kinematics that correspond to the experiment shown in d. The wing stroke (red) amplitudes of the left (solid line) and the right (dotted line) wings are 42 and 41 degrees, respectively. The wing pitch (blue) amplitudes of the left (solid line) and the right (dotted line) wings are 57 and 61 degrees, respectively.
- Image of flapping wing microrobots driven by a single actuator, two actuators, and four actuators. Scale bars (a, d, f) represent 5 mm.